Mobile version Today: 30.08.2015 Last update 14:41 | Select date
 
 
home sitemap write a letter facebook twitter
Add to favourites RSS


ONLINE JOURNAL
About us
Authors
Contacts
    London Gold Fix Closed – Sign of Drastic Changes the World Financial System...  
    Nuland attempts Kiev Version 2.0 in Skopje  
    Mission Imperative: Why the West and Kiev Regime Must Kill the Truth  
  HOME PAGE WORLD BUSINESS HISTORY & CULTURE COLUMNISTS  
 
 
 
EDITOR'S CHOICE
 
India’s central bank governor warns on banking reforms
 
Obama’s Ukrainian Forces Break Minsk Agreement: Resume Invasion
all articles
 
 
 
 
NEWS
 
 
Russia Has No Plans to Attack Any NATO Member – Ex Senior US Official...

Kiev Defies Minsk Accords, Resists Western Demands for Donbass Self-Rule...

Washington concerned U.S. lagging behind Russia in Arctic...

Russian senator criticizes proposal to suspend Russian-US diplomatic relations...

Iran sees China major partner in post-nuclear-deal era: Rouhani...

Spotlight: Germany, dreamland for Syrian asylum seekers...

Malaysia's ruling party promises huge rally to trump anti-government protests...

South Africa says interested in LNG, GTL projects in Iran...

Daesh terrorists kidnap 200 civilians in Iraq’s Anbar Province...

Cheap Oil Always Boosts Economic Growth – UK Economist...

Poll lead for Greece's Syriza narrows as Tsipras presses for new mandate...

Thai police nab foreigner in connection with Bangkok bombing...

US lost its global leadership during Obama presidency: Cheney...

Putin, Merkel, Hollande discuss further functioning of Normandy format...

EU Migration Policy Failure - Slovakian Leader...

all news
 
 
 
FACEBOOK
 
 

 

 
 
 

Pentagon

| Go to news

The publication period from     

 

 

Is the New U.S. ‘Law of War Manual’ Actually ‘Hitlerian’?

The Obama U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has quietly issued its important Law of War Manual, and, unlike its predecessor, the 1956 U.S. Army Field Manual, which was not designed to approve of the worst practices by both the United States and its enemies in World War II, or after 9/11, this new document has been alleged specifically to do just that: to allow such attacks as the United States did on Dresden, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, and in Iraq, and elsewhere. 

EDITOR'S CHOICE | 20.08.2015


 

Europe Turning Into Hotbed: US Boosts Military Presence

The US Marine Corps shipped four Abrams main battle tanks, three howitzer artillery cannons and six light armored reconnaissance vehicles to the Combined Arms Company on Sunday, August 16, said Capt. Richard Ulsh, a spokesman for Marine Corps Forces Europe...

Andrei AKULOV | 19.08.2015


 

What’s Behind Plans to Deploy US Missiles in Europe?

The US has been ramping up the controversy over alleged violations of Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF). As far back as December 2014, Rose Gottemoeller, Under Secretary for arms control and international security, told Congress it was important to make Russia comply with the treaty. This June the United States picked up the issue again...

Yuriy RUBTSOV | 09.08.2015


 

Pentagon Prepares to Send Better Radar to Ukraine

EDITOR'S CHOICE | 23.07.2015


 

Countering the neo-Cold Warriors

Shortly, the «gruesome twosome» of U.S.-Russian relations, Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland and NATO Supreme Commander General Philip Breedlove, will be joined by a third neo-Cold Warrior, Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford, the prospective Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to become the «terrible troika» of American officials clamoring for a military showdown with Moscow...

Wayne MADSEN | 15.07.2015


 

Deciphering the Pentagon’s latest anger towards Russia

In successive weeks, the United States has ramped up tensions with Russia. Two highly provocative statements have emanated from the Pentagon. One was the Pentagon report titled 2015 National Military Strategy issued a fortnight ago, at the instance of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, naming Russia and China as two world powers with which the US may have to fight a war with “immense consequences.”

EDITOR'S CHOICE | 14.07.2015


 

Pentagon Concludes America Not Safe Unless It Conquers The World

The Pentagon has released its «National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2015». The document announces a shift in focus from terrorists to «state actors» that «are challenging international norms». It is important to understand what these words mean. Governments that challenge international norms are sovereign countries that pursue policies independently of Washington’s policies.  These «revisionist states» are threats, not because they plan to attack the US, which the Pentagon admits neither Russia nor China intend, but because they are independent.  In other words, the norm is dependence on Washington...

Paul Craig ROBERTS | 10.07.2015


 

US Preparing for Never Ending War

The new military strategy is a fundamental document of global nature along with the National Security Strategy and Cyber Security Strategy. The US believes that the preservation of economic status-quo in the world and dissemination of so called «universal values» meet the national security interests. «Since the last National Military Strategy was published in 2011, global disorder has significantly increased while some of our comparative military advantage has begun to erode», Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey wrote in his introduction to the strategy document. That’s why the need for a new document came to the fore. The strategy reads that «today, the probability of U.S. involvement in interstate war with a major power is assessed to be low but growing»...

Leonid SAVIN | 05.07.2015


 

New US military strategy: ‘Russia, China - threat to unipolar domination fantasy’

The Pentagon’s new military strategy proposes that Russia is a major US adversary, that there might be a war between the two countries, and that the US is losing its military technology supremacy, says Brian Becker from the anti-war Answer Coalition.

EDITOR'S CHOICE | 03.07.2015


 

Pentagon paying ISIS-linked ‘rebels’ $400 per month to ‘eventually’ fight Assad

The Pentagon announced Monday that it has begun paying “moderate” Syrian rebels up to $400 per month to fight ISIS and eventually the Syrian government.

EDITOR'S CHOICE | 26.06.2015




1 2 3 4 5 6
 
 
 
OUR COLUMNIST
    Mahdi Darius NAZEMROAYA

Washington’s Financial / Currency War on China: Eclipsing of US Dollar by Yuan

The Chinese are in the process of displacing the monopoly of the US dollar. They are dropping their US Treasury bonds, stockpiling gold reserves, and opening regional distribution banks for their own national currency. This will give them easier access to capital markets and insulate them from financial manipulation by Washington and Wall Street...

30.08.2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAGS
 
 
 
Aeroflot AFISMA African Union Africom AIIB AIPAC Al Qaeda Al Shabaab Al-Jazeera ALBA Amnesty International Anonymous Ansar Allah APEC Arab League ASEAN ATAKA Atomstroyexport Bank for International Settlements Bank of America Barclays Basel Committee BBC Bilderberg Club Black Bloc BlackRock Blackwater Boco Haram BP BRICS CARICOM CELAC Center for Responsive Politics CEPAL Chatham House Chevron CIA CICA CIS Citigroup CNN Committee of 147 Committee of 300 Council of Europe Council on Foreign Relations Crescent Crescent Petroleum CSTO Customs Union CyberBerkut DARPA Davos DEA Defense Intelligence Agency DIA Dragon Family E.ON Eager Lion ECOWAS EDA ELNET Enbridge Pipelines ETA EU EULEX EurAsEc Eurasian Union European Commission European Court of Human Rights European Union Exxon Mobil Facebook FAO FARC FATAH FBI FDA Federal Reserve FIFA Financial Action Task Force Financial Stability Board Fitch FIVE EYES Franklin Templeton Freedom House FRS FSB FTA FUEN G-4 G20 G7 G8 GATA Gazprom GCHQ GECF Gladio Glonass Goldman Sachs Google Green Group Greenpeace GUAM Guardian Gulf Cooperation Council Hague Tribunal HAMAS Heritage Foundation Hezbollah Hizb ut-Tahrir HSBC Human Rights Watch IAEA IEA IHRC IMF International Criminal Court Interpol IOC ISAF Islamic jihad Islamic Revolution Guards Corps ITERA Jamestown Jobbik JP Morgan Jundullah KFOR KLA Ku Klux Klan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam Lukoil Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mercosur Microsoft Missile defense Missile Defense Agency Monsanto Moody's Morgan Stanley Mossad Most-Favoured Nation Mujahedin-e Khalq Muslim Brotherhood Nabucco NAFTA Naftogaz NASA Nation of Islam National Security Agency NATO NDAA NDI NED Non-aligned Movement NORAD Nord Stream NORTHCOM Northern Distribution Network NSA OECD Oerlikon OIC OPCW OPEC Open Government Partnership Organization of American States OSCE OTW movement OUN / UPA PACE PACOM Pan-Europa movement Pegida Pentagon PJAK PKK Podemos PRISM PYD Red Cross Renova Republican Party Rosatom Roscosmos Rosneft Rosoboronexport Ruhrgas RusAl RWE SABSA Scientology Shanghai Cooperation Organization Shell Siemens South Stream Southern Command Standard & Poor's Statoil Strategic Nuclear Forces Stratfor SWF SWIFT Syrian National Council SYRIZA Taliban Tamarod TAPI TeleSur TNK-BP Total Transneft TTIP TTP Turkish Stream Twitter UN UN International Court UNASUR UNESCO UNICEF USAID Valdai Club Visegrad Group Wall Street Westinghouse WHO Wikileaks World Bank WTO Yukos “Mass Atrocity Response Operations”
 
 
 

Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.


 

 

 
 
© Strategic Culture Foundation

RSS

Main Politics History&Culture Archive Authors Popular
  Economics Columns About Contact