Mobile version Today: 23.04.2014 Last update 00:34 | Select date RUS | ENG | SRB
 
 
home sitemap write a letter facebook twitter
Add to favourites RSS


ONLINE JOURNAL
About us
Authors
Contacts
    Putin Stands Out as a Real World Leader  
    The Indoctrinated West  
    Phone Wrecks: The Secret Agenda of Ashton and Nuland Revealed  
  HOME PAGE WORLD BUSINESS HISTORY & CULTURE COLUMNISTS  
 
 
 
EDITOR'S CHOICE
 
Lavrov: Kiev issued 'criminal order' allowing use of weapons against civilians
 
Preparing Ukraine for a Proxy War with Russia
all articles
 
 
 
 
NEWS
 
 
Syria denies using toxic materials in battles against rebels...

Hamas, Abbas's PLO announce reconciliation agreement...

Syria foreign-backed opposition asks Saudis for more aid...

Lavrov: Russian troops stay on own territory, take no steps against obligations...

Right Sector's "Donbass" battalion to assist crackdown on federalists in eastern Ukraine...

Turkey Extends Unprecedented Condolences to Armenian People...

Kiev must immediately deescalate east Ukraine crisis, call back troops - Moscow...

Bomb kills police general in Cairo - security...

Report on CIA interrogations shadows Gitmo trials...

Supporters of Ukraine’s federalization picketed mayor's office in Kharkiv...

US Troops to Arrive for Exercises in Lithuania...

No Reason to Doubt US Running the Show in Ukraine – Lavrov...

Bahrain sentences 12 protesters to life in prison...

CSTO Security Council secretaries to discuss situation at Tajik-Afghan border...

Russia’s envoy to UN hopes Geneva deals on Ukraine will be implemented...

all news
 
 
 
FACEBOOK
 
 

 

 
 
 
back print
 
WORLD

Obama’s Feisty Proclamations are Subliminal

Melkulangara BHADRAKUMAR | 31.01.2014 | 00:00
 

The US President Barack Obama’s one hour, sixteen-minute State of the Union address in Washington on Tuesday was largely devoted to illustrating a single point, namely, that 2014 can be a «breakthrough year» for the American economy. Obama sounded acutely self-conscious that his presidency has hit the bumps. The latest CNN poll showed him at a low 43% approval rating. 

Unsurprisingly, foreign policy issues took a back seat. Although Obama pointedly touched on the Iran problem and the Middle East, US’s ‘rebalance’ to Asia and the turmoil in Ukraine, the details were skimpy…

One major announcement he made was that the prison at Guantanamo Bay ought to be closed within the year, but, again, this ultimately turns out to be the reiteration of an intention which is as old as Obama’s five-year old presidency, and he didn’t give any clue how he proposed to get the «remaining restrictions on detainee transfers» removed by a recalcitrant Congress, which has been in no mood to cooperate with him on any issue.

Obama did not even once use the term ‘exceptionalism’, but instead there has been a swagger, contrived or spontaneous, and he did expound ideas that in his opinion made America truly exceptional. He said, «From Tunisia to Burma, we’re supporting those who are willing to do the hard work of building democracy. In Ukraine, we stand for the principle that all people have the right to express themselves freely and peacefully and to have a say in their country’s future.» 

Four issues that Obama discussed – Iran, Syria, Afghanistan and the ‘pivot’ to Asia – need to be put in perspective. As regards Iran, Obama repeated his rejection of any more sanctions being legislated against Iran, whilst the negotiations are going on regarding the nuclear problem. He repeated that he would exercise his presidential prerogative to veto any such legislation. 

Obama claimed once again that the Geneva agreement meant rolling back «parts» of Iran’s nuclear program, although Tehran has openly rubbished such an interpretation. Clearly, Obama was addressing the lawmakers on Capitol Hill and the US domestic opinion. He continued to insist that he «stands ready to exercise all options to make sure Iran does not build a nuclear weapon.» 

Obama repeated his skepticism about the success of his engagement policy toward Iran, which again is more a hedge, because «we’re [US] clear about the mistrust between our nations, mistrust that cannot be wished away.» In their totality, Obama’s remarks on Iran contained no new elements. What stood out from the fact that it was on Iran that he spoke at some length in his speech, is the highest importance he attaches in the year ahead to the resolution of «one of the leading security challenges of our time without the risks of war.» 

Obama’s remark on Syria was, in comparison, curt and wrapped up in a couple of sentences. The interesting part is that it came hot on the heels of the Geneva 2 conference last week. Surely, it does cause some uneasiness that Obama’s stress was the US’ continued «support» for the non-jihadi rebel forces. He did not say a word about the peace talks in Geneva. He left things suspended in the air by saying the US will «continue to work with the international community to usher in the future the Syrian people deserve – a future free of dictatorship, terror and fear.» 

But then, this has been how all along the regime-change agenda has been propagandistically presented by the so-called ‘Friends of Syria’ grouping, which includes the US. A question arises: Is the Obama administration considering a revving up of the support for the rebel fighters in Syria following the impasse at Geneva 2? 

On Afghanistan, Obama made it clear there is no going back on his decision on troop withdrawal. He stressed that the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan signified «America’s longest war will finally be over.» Obama seemed unsure of the US-Afghan Bilateral Security Agreement coming through, by saying if it is signed, a «small force» will remain in Afghanistan «to carry out two narrow missions,» namely, training and assisting the Afghan forces and, secondly, for undertaking counterterrorism operations against «any remnants of al-Qaeda.» He didn’t refer to the Taliban at all. 

The remarks on Syria, Afghanistan and the al-Qaeda problem, put together, arguably, the contours of a ‘Obama doctrine’ emerges. He himself underscored the following:

The deployment of US forces in conflict situations should be only if «it is truly necessary.» 

The US should avoid getting «mired in open-ended conflicts.» 

Large-scale US troop deployments abroad will «drain our strength and may ultimately feed extremism.» 

Counterterrorist operations must be active and aggressive but should be through «targeted efforts» and by building the capacity of the US’ foreign partners. 

«America must move off a permanent war footing.» 

Curiously, however, the Obama doctrine doesn’t apply to the US’ ‘rebalance’ strategy in Asia. He asserted, «we will continue to focus on the Asia-Pacific, where we support our allies, shape a future of greater security and prosperity.» Yet, the ‘pivot’ to Asia is a strategic reset necessitating the deployment of 60 percent of the US’ fleet in the Pacific, and equipping the Pacific Command with the most cutting-edge capabilities by 2020. 

Put differently, America is indeed gearing up on a «permanent war footing» in the Asia-Pacific. The principal purpose of the rebalance strategy is to guarantee that US’ hegemony in Asia-Pacific remains unchallenged through the 21st century. The US is inserting itself into China’s problems and disputes with its neighbors by posing as a neutral party but de facto becoming a participant. In fact, the US’ military presence has already complicated the Asia-Pacific security scenario. 

In sum, the disconcerting part of Obama’s State of the Union address is that he was grandstanding. For example, he couldn’t resist taking a swipe at Russia by remarking that when Team USA «marches the red, white and blue into the Olympic stadium» at Sochi next week and «brings home the gold,» it will be an expression of the US’ commitment to the «inherent dignity and equality of every human being, regardless of race or religion, creed or sexual orientation». 

At the end of the day, Obama could not help reverting to American exceptionalism. He said, «My fellow Americans, no other country in the world does what we do. On every issue, the world turns to us, not simply because of the size of our economy or our military might but because of the ideals we stand for and the burdens we bear to advance them.» Of course, this is sheer humbug. Such feisty proclamations prompted a CNN commentator to compare Obama’s state of the Union address to a «Rorschach of sorts» – a reference to the inkblot test associated with the Swiss psychologist Hermann Rorschach, which helps examine a person’s personality characteristics and emotional functioning and to detect underlying thought disorder where patients are reluctant to describe their thinking processes openly. 

 
Tags: Asia-Pacific China Middle East Russia US Obama
 

 
Rating: 5.0 (9)      Your rating: 1 2 3 4 5     
 
Send by e-mail

Comments
 
To add a comment, Login or Register
 
 
 
OUR COLUMNIST
    Pyotr BODROV

The OSCE in Ukraine and Russian Spring

In connection with the deepening crisis in Ukraine, representatives of several OSCE missions have famously arrived in the country. On 21 April, I had occasion to talk with two long-term observers with the OSCE Election Observation Mission, Anthony Robinson (Great Britain) and Lester Margosian (USA)... I got the impression that the mission is occupied with serious analytical work... The objectives and possible outcomes of this work are, as yet, unclear.  One thing is clear, however. This is the first time that Europe and the US have dealt with Russians in Ukraine so attentively, and this is a result of the fact that in the southeast of Ukraine, they are calling for a ‘Russian Spring’.

24.04.2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAGS
 
 
 
Aeroflot AFISMA African Union Africom AIPAC Al Qaeda Al Shabaab Al-Jazeera ALBA Amnesty International Anonymous APEC Arab League ASEAN ATAKA Atomstroyexport Bank for International Settlements Bank of America Barclays Basel Committee BBC Bilderberg Club Black Bloc Blackwater Boco Haram BP BRICS CELAC Center for Responsive Politics CEPAL Chevron CIA CIS Citigroup CNN Committee of 147 Committee of 300 Council of Europe Council on Foreign Relations Crescent Crescent Petroleum CSTO Customs Union DARPA Davos DEA Defense Intelligence Agency DIA Dragon Family E.ON Eager Lion ECOWAS EDA ELNET Enbridge Pipelines ETA EU EULEX EurAsEc Eurasian Union European Commission European Court of Human Rights European Union Exxon Mobil Facebook FAO FARC FATAH FBI FDA Federal Reserve FIFA Financial Action Task Force Financial Stability Board Fitch Franklin Templeton Freedom House FRS FSB FTA FUEN G-4 G20 G7 G8 GATA Gazprom GECF Glonass Goldman Sachs Google Greenpeace GUAM Guardian Gulf Cooperation Council Hague Tribunal HAMAS Heritage Foundation Hezbollah Hizb ut-Tahrir HSBC Human Rights Watch IAEA IEA IHRC IMF International Criminal Court Interpol IOC ISAF Islamic jihad Islamic Revolution Guards Corps ITERA Jamestown JP Morgan Jundullah KFOR KLA Ku Klux Klan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam Lukoil Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mercosur Microsoft Missile defense Missile Defense Agency Moody's Morgan Stanley Mossad Most-Favoured Nation Mujahedin-e Khalq Muslim Brotherhood Nabucco Naftogaz NASA Nation of Islam National Security Agency NATO NDAA NDI NED Non-aligned Movement NORAD Nord Stream NORTHCOM Northern Distribution Network NSA OECD Oerlikon OIC OPCW OPEC Open Government Partnership Organization of American States OSCE OTW movement OUN / UPA PACE PACOM Pan-Europa movement Pentagon PJAK PKK PRISM PYD Red Cross Renova Republican Party Rosatom Roscosmos Rosneft Rosoboronexport Ruhrgas RusAl RWE SABSA Scientology Shanghai Cooperation Organization Shell Siemens South Stream Southern Command Standard & Poor's Statoil Strategic Nuclear Forces Stratfor SWF SWIFT Syrian National Council SYRIZA Taliban Tamarod TAPI TeleSur TNK-BP Total Transneft TTIP Twitter UN UN International Court UNASUR UNESCO USAID Valdai Club Wall Street Westinghouse Wikileaks World Bank WTO Yukos “Mass Atrocity Response Operations”
 
 
 

Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.


 

 

 
 
© Strategic Culture Foundation

RSS

Main Politics History&Culture Archive Authors Popular
  Economics Columns About Contact

Яндекс.Метрика

 

Melkulangara BHADRAKUMAR

Former career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service. Devoted much of his 3-decade long career to the Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran desks in the Ministry of External Affairs and in assignments on the territory of the former Soviet Union.  After leaving the diplomatic service, took to writing and contribute to The Asia Times, The Hindu and Deccan Herald. Lives in New Delhi.


all articles