Mobile version Today: 27.08.2014 Last update 12:07 | Select date RUS | ENG | SRB
 
 
home sitemap write a letter facebook twitter
Add to favourites RSS


ONLINE JOURNAL
About us
Authors
Contacts
    MH-17: Beware of the «Chameleon»  
    Weapons, Prostitutes and Drugs –These are Things Petro Poroshenko is...  
    Russia’s Rise to Global Power  
  HOME PAGE WORLD BUSINESS HISTORY & CULTURE COLUMNISTS  
 
 
 
EDITOR'S CHOICE
 
Selective Outrage over Ukraine POWs
 
Political Europe Suppressed Under Washington´s Thumb Is Waking Up
all articles
 
 
 
 
NEWS
 
 
Moldova-Romania cross-border gas pipeline construction completed...

Russia can’t set ceasefire conditions in Ukraine’s internal conflict – Putin...

First Results of Talks in Minsk Positive...

Donetsk militia forces claim seizing control of Starobeshevo from pro-Kiev troops...

Putin, Poroshenko start bilateral talks...

Embargoed EU Goods Actively Re-Imported to Russia via Belarus – Putin...

Turkey's Kurds warn of massive refugee flow from northern Iraq...

Ukraine Not Responsible For Reliable Transit of Gas to Europe – Energy Minister...

Donetsk militias insist on swapping all captives, promise no further compromises...

Armed standoff in eastern Ukraine kills 2,249, injures 6,033...

Merkel Speaks Against Catalonia Independence Referendum...

Moscow Will Have to Respond to Kiev’s Association With EU – Putin...

US Crying Wolf on Iraq Escalation...

Libya needs ‘foreign help’ to defeat Islamists...

Israeli air strikes target more Gaza high-rises...

all news
 
 
 
FACEBOOK
 
 

 

 
 
 
back print
 
COLUMNISTS

Afghanistan: A Test for Durability

Nikolai BOBKIN | 29.01.2014 | 00:00
 

The presidential elections which are to be held in Afghanistan in April 2014 will be a serious test for Kabul and the states which support the current Afghan regime. 80% of Afghans believe that it is simply dangerous to go to the polls. On the day of the last parliamentary elections in Afghanistan (October 2010) dozens of people were killed and injured. 

On January 17 in the diplomatic quarter, a suicide bomber caused an explosion in front of the entrance to a Lebanese restaurant, after which two militants burst into the restaurant through the back door and opened fire on customers. According to the latest statistics, there are a total of 21 dead, most of them foreigners. Among the dead is Russian diplomat Vadim Nazarov, an officer of the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. Russia condemned the terrorist attack and those behind it, and the Taliban has taken responsibility for the attack. Taliban leaders have refused an invitation to take part in the presidential elections and promise to sabotage them.

Since October 2004 the post of President of Afghanistan has been held for two five-year terms by Hamid Karzai, who was elected, but under the conditions of foreign occupation. This time, on the threshold of the withdrawal of international forces, the situation with regard to holding nationwide elections remains critical. Conditions in the country are still unstable, and Afghan leadership is encountering enormous difficulties, meeting with resistance from a significant part of the country's population. Nonetheless, the technical preparations for the presidential elections have begun even without any certainty that they can be conducted safely.

27 people entered the presidential race. The appearance of a final list of candidates provided a clearer picture of the political competition which continues to come into sharper focus. After the Electoral Commission had completed the verification process, a preliminary list of 11 presidential candidates who were found to have met constitutional and legal requirements was published. 16 candidates were disqualified, including the only woman, as well as several with dual citizenship. This time a new requirement that each candidate obtain the support of 100,000 voters from at least 20 provinces of Afghanistan was made.

The Electoral Commission worked on updating the list of registered voters. On a district level over 3 million new voter cards were issued; about 30% of them were received by women. The Ministry of the Interior has started hiring and training 13,000 female inspectors who will help make access safer for woman voters. For security reasons four districts (one in Zabul province, one in Ghazni province and two in Helmand province) were not included in the Electoral Commission's updating of the registered voter list. There is no certainty that voting will take place at all in these regions; almost a quarter of Afghanistan is under the control of the Taliban and other Afghan parties and groups which are making terrorist threats against election personnel, candidates and their supporters.

An unexpected recent event was a call from Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the leader of the Islamic Party of Afghanistan (IPA), for his supporters to take part in the election. The IPA did not put forth a candidate "due to the presence of occupying forces in the country", but it still, said Hekmatyar, has the right to support candidates close to the party. Despite this change in the position of the IPA, Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid excludes the possibility of a schism in their ranks on the issue of their position on the April elections. The Talibs still refuse any contacts with the various candidates and the administration of President Karzai. 

There is also a presidential candidate who is ideologically close to Hekmatyar among those who oppose both Karzai and the Talibs. This is Rasul Sayyaf, a Pashtun from the province of Laghman and one of Afghanistan's most authoritative Islamic politicians who has many years of experience leading the Mujahedin faction Islamic Union for the Liberation of Afghanistan in the years of Soviet occupation. In February 1989 he was elected as the first prime minister of the transitional Mujahedin government, and then cooperated closely with Rabbani and Hekmatyar. Sayyaf was always an opponent of the Taliban movement and fought against the Taliban with the Northern Alliance, which once again demonstrates the instability of intra-Afghan alliances. 

Despite the fact that before registering to participate in the elections Sayyaf officially held a position of little significance in the lower house of the Afghan parliament, he has not lost his status as one of the country's most conservative and authoritative imams. This is confirmed by the acquiescence of field commander Ismail Khan to become Sayyaf's first vice president. Ismail Khan's traditional patrimony has for decades been the western provinces of Afghanistan bordering on Iran, with their center in the city of Herat. Such a duet could compete with Karzai's protégé, especially since the duet has already declared its commitment to strengthening Afghanistan's ties with NATO countries. It is entirely likely that Sayyaf's signature could appear on the Afghan-American security agreement which Karzai refuses to sign before the new presidential election. It is unlikely that under his administration one could expect any serious changes in the country's political system, and the Taliban would only be able to count on gaining a relatively small share in governing the state.

One cannot completely rule out the possibility that a representative of one of Afghanistan's non-Pashtun ethnicities could win the election. In the upper house of Afghanistan's parliament (the House of Elders), the proportion of Pashtuns and Tajiks is almost equal (36 and 33, respectively), and if one takes into account representatives of all the non-Pashtun diasporas, the Pashtuns are well in the minority (36 out of 102). The traditional allies of the Tajiks in elections, the Hazara, participate actively in political life. For example, all the members of the Afghan parliament from the Ghazni province are currently Hazara, and their share in the House of the People after the last elections increased by almost 70%. At the 2010 parliamentary elections over 2500 candidates competed for 249 seats in the lower house of parliament; as a result of the voting, the Pashtuns lost some of their seats compared with the previous parliamentary elections in 2005 and no longer have a majority of the votes.

Former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Afghanistan (2001-2006) Abdullah Abdullah could give Sayyaf some serious competition. He is considered an ethnic Tajik, but he is actually half Pashtun. His father was a Pashtun born in Kandahar, and his mother was a Tajik born in Panjshir. At the last presidential election Abdullah received 30% of the votes; after lengthy controversy he was admitted to the second round (Karzai had received 49.6%), but he dropped out of the race 7 days before the election. Officially it was announced that Karzai had received an absolute majority of the votes (over 3 million), but according to European Union observers no more than 1.8 million people voted for him. Some polling places were closed on election day due to Taliban attacks, while others were blocked by Karzai's supporters. International observers expressed doubt in the free and fair nature of the elections, and many Afghans to this day consider Abdullah's defeat a falsification. One way or another, it is too early to predict a victory for Karzai's "successor", but the threat to security in such an event is inevitable.

The Afghan government and the Taliban remain irreconcilable. The main demand of the Taliban is the complete liberation of Afghanistan from foreign occupation. Taliban leaders do not even see Karzai's government as a party to be negotiated with and have already announced that they will not recognize the results of the presidential elections and will continue to bear arms against Afghan and international forces... 

 
Tags: NATO Afghanistan Central Asia Middle East US
 

 
Rating: 5.0 (4)      Your rating: 1 2 3 4 5     
 
Send by e-mail

Comments
 
To add a comment, Login or Register
 
 
 
OUR COLUMNIST
    Wayne MADSEN

Media spies put all journalists in danger

The increasing tendency of the Central Intelligence Agency and other U.S. intelligence agencies to disregard previous prohibitions against the use of journalists as agents puts every legitimate reporter around the world in jeopardy. The CIA has a checkered past in the use of journalists as intelligence agents. The practice was common in the 1960s and early 70s but was banned by Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. However, when President Ronald Reagan helped reignite the Cold War, the CIA again began using journalists as intelligence agents. The practice put a number of journalists in jeopardy, especially those taken captive by guerrillas groups during the Lebanese civil war. There is nothing to suggest any president since Reagan has discontinued the practice of using journalists as agents...

27.08.2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAGS
 
 
 
Aeroflot AFISMA African Union Africom AIPAC Al Qaeda Al Shabaab Al-Jazeera ALBA Amnesty International Anonymous APEC Arab League ASEAN ATAKA Atomstroyexport Bank for International Settlements Bank of America Barclays Basel Committee BBC Bilderberg Club Black Bloc Blackwater Boco Haram BP BRICS CELAC Center for Responsive Politics CEPAL Chevron CIA CICA CIS Citigroup CNN Committee of 147 Committee of 300 Council of Europe Council on Foreign Relations Crescent Crescent Petroleum CSTO Customs Union DARPA Davos DEA Defense Intelligence Agency DIA Dragon Family E.ON Eager Lion ECOWAS EDA ELNET Enbridge Pipelines ETA EU EULEX EurAsEc Eurasian Union European Commission European Court of Human Rights European Union Exxon Mobil Facebook FAO FARC FATAH FBI FDA Federal Reserve FIFA Financial Action Task Force Financial Stability Board Fitch Franklin Templeton Freedom House FRS FSB FTA FUEN G-4 G20 G7 G8 GATA Gazprom GECF Glonass Goldman Sachs Google Greenpeace GUAM Guardian Gulf Cooperation Council Hague Tribunal HAMAS Heritage Foundation Hezbollah Hizb ut-Tahrir HSBC Human Rights Watch IAEA IEA IHRC IMF International Criminal Court Interpol IOC ISAF Islamic jihad Islamic Revolution Guards Corps ITERA Jamestown JP Morgan Jundullah KFOR KLA Ku Klux Klan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam Lukoil Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mercosur Microsoft Missile defense Missile Defense Agency Moody's Morgan Stanley Mossad Most-Favoured Nation Mujahedin-e Khalq Muslim Brotherhood Nabucco Naftogaz NASA Nation of Islam National Security Agency NATO NDAA NDI NED Non-aligned Movement NORAD Nord Stream NORTHCOM Northern Distribution Network NSA OECD Oerlikon OIC OPCW OPEC Open Government Partnership Organization of American States OSCE OTW movement OUN / UPA PACE PACOM Pan-Europa movement Pentagon PJAK PKK PRISM PYD Red Cross Renova Republican Party Rosatom Roscosmos Rosneft Rosoboronexport Ruhrgas RusAl RWE SABSA Scientology Shanghai Cooperation Organization Shell Siemens South Stream Southern Command Standard & Poor's Statoil Strategic Nuclear Forces Stratfor SWF SWIFT Syrian National Council SYRIZA Taliban Tamarod TAPI TeleSur TNK-BP Total Transneft TTIP Twitter UN UN International Court UNASUR UNESCO USAID Valdai Club Wall Street Westinghouse Wikileaks World Bank WTO Yukos “Mass Atrocity Response Operations”
 
 
 

Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.


 

 

 
 
© Strategic Culture Foundation

RSS

Main Politics History&Culture Archive Authors Popular
  Economics Columns About Contact

Яндекс.Метрика

 

Nikolai BOBKIN


all articles