Mobile version Today: 27.12.2014 Last update 11:54 | Select date RUS | ENG | SRB
 
 
home sitemap write a letter facebook twitter
Add to favourites RSS


ONLINE JOURNAL
About us
Authors
Contacts
    How the CIA Launched the «Financial Pearl Harbor» Attacks on Russia and...  
    Russia Confronts US’ Containment Strategy  
    Otto von Bismarck’s Epistle to Angela Merkel  
  HOME PAGE WORLD BUSINESS HISTORY & CULTURE COLUMNISTS  
 
 
 
EDITOR'S CHOICE
 
West has responsibility to engage with Russia
 
Legionnaire “financial Maidan” in Russia
all articles
 
 
 
 
NEWS
 
 
Ukrainian Nazis continued shelling residential areas of Donetsk...

Kyrgyzstan joining Eurasian Economic Union on very good conditions - president...

Ukraine stops cargo, passengers trains to Crimea - Crimean Railway...

Moscow, Kiev Sign Agreement on Electricity Supply to Ukraine: Official...

Russia to Deliver 500,000 Tons of Coal Per Month to Ukraine: Official...

US Reviewing Russian Military Doctrine: White House...

Army forces deal heavy blows to militants across Syria...

Russia to counteract NATO's boosted presence in Black Sea – envoy...

Luhansk republic ready for resuming railway service with Moscow - official...

Largest ever exchange of captives between Kiev troops, militias takes place in Donbas...

Massive Anti-Government Rally Held in Bahraini Capital Despite Protest Ban...

Russia Launches Advanced Earth-Sensing Satellite Atop Soyuz Rocket...

Russia’s new military doctrine lists NATO, US as major foreign threats...

Deployment of foreign troops in Ukraine possible - Russian ambassador to NATO...

US Warship Destroyer Donald Cook Enters Black Sea Second Time This Year...

all news
 
 
 
FACEBOOK
 
 

 

 
 
 
back print
 
COLUMNISTS

Pyrrhic Victories over Geneva 2 Conference

Melkulangara BHADRAKUMAR | 22.01.2014 | 00:00
 

The good thing is that the United Nations and the United Sates might have ‘won’ and ‘lost’ during the forty-eight hours in the run-up to the Geneva 2 conference scheduled to begin on Wednesday. Seldom has an international peace conference been held under such strange circumstances. 

It all began with the surprise invitation extended by the Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban Ki-Moon in the weekend to Iran to attend the conference, disregarding the objection raised by the United States on the ground that Tehran has not voiced explicit support for the June 2012 Communique regarding the Syria, which forms the basis of the forthcoming conference.

Indeed, Ban was exercising his prerogative as the ‘convener’ of the Geneva 2 conference and he claimed that in a series of meetings and telephone conversations in recent days or weeks senior Iranian officials had assured him that Tehran «understood and supported the basis and goal» of the upcoming event on Wednesday, «including the Geneva Communique». 

Ban apparently pulled off a diplomatic coup since Iran’s participation altogether transforms the scope of Wednesday’s conference. Prima facie, the invitation to Iran seemed a feather on Ban’s cap, affirming his robust independence of decision-making despite the overt American pressure on him to stay away from Iran. But in reality, it is inconceivable that American diplomats at the UN were unaware of Ban’s consultations with Iranian officials. 

At any rate, on Sunday, Ban won on the world stage, but only ‘lose’ on Monday when apparently coming under immense American pressure, he was made to eat the humble pie and rescinded the invitation to Iran. He put the blame on the Iranian doorstep, claiming that Tehran’s response to the invitation was «not at all consistent with [its] stated commitment». Presumably, Ban expected Tehran would meet the US pre-condition, whereas, it refused to blink. Although it accepted Ban’s invitation and hinted it would take part in the conference, it announced the next day that it won’t take part, after all, «given the US insistence to set a precondition» – although, as Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian explained on Tuesday, Tehran has made clear its readiness to be involved without pre-conditions. It was vintage Iranian response. 

Meanwhile, Washington, which ‘lost’ when Ban extended the invitation to Iran, ‘won’ within a day with the secretary-general’s retraction in the face of the open demand by it that he should do so unless Tehran «fully and publicly» voiced support for the 2012 road map in Syria. 

The mystique of diplomacy is that sometimes what is won could turn out to be Pyrrhic victory. Has the US won a Pyrrhic victory? The Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov was spot on when he expressed strong indignation at what has happened. Lavrov said on Monday, «Forty countries have been invited to the Geneva 2 talks. Among the countries invited are Australia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, Japan, Brazil, India, Indonesia, and many others. And if Iran is excluded from the list then the conference will resemble something profane. 

«Iran, of course, along with Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states, Turkey, Egypt and Iraq, is one of the countries interested in resolving the situation without further damaging the stability of this important region of the world».

Clearly, Iran’s participation would have phenomenally transformed the ABC of the Geneva 2 conference. But then, Washington had one eye on the Syrian National Coalition [SNC] while demanding Ban to rescind, because the motley crowd of Syrian opposition was threatening to wriggle out of attending the Geneva 2 conference using Iran’s participation as alibi. Washington had made Herculean efforts through recent weeks to get the SNC on board. But the Obama administration would also be of the sensitivities of Saudi Arabia over Iran’s participation in Geneva 2. 

The Obama administration is taking care to sequester the US’ engagement with Iran on the nuclear issue from the squabble over the list of invitees to Geneva 2. In fact, it hailed on Monday Iran’s suspension of high-level uranium enrichment in the weekend as providing an «unprecedented opportunity». Within hours, of Iranian scientists cutting the links feeding centrifuges in the Natanz plant and at Fordow underground site near Tehran in the presence of IAEA inspectors, the European Union announced moves to ease sanctions against Iran. In sum, as the head of Iran’s atomic energy organization Ali Akbar Salehi put it, «The iceberg of sanctions against Iran is melting». 

As the summer months arrive and the melting of the sanctions iceberg accelerates, Tehran stands to gain. Unsurprisingly, it will not make an issue of Ban’s curious retraction over the invitation to Geneva 2. Again, Tehran would estimate that ultimately, it has a crucial role to play in any Syrian peace process and the US would learn to live with it. 

Doesn’t Washington realize that Iran is a key player on the Syrian turf? Of course, it does. Nonetheless, it would seek to deal with the Geneva 2 process with Russia as its primary interlocutor at this stage rather than having to face ‘Russia plus Iran’. Put differently, the US would like to avoid any co-relation developing between the Geneva 2 process and the Obama administration’s engagement with Iran as such (where it doesn’t want a third-party role, either.) The two processes must run on separate tracks. Suffice to say, selective engagement of Russia and Iran would be what the Obama administration prefers so that Washington’s diplomacy could be optimal. To be sure, the growing Russian-Iranian strategic understanding impacts the American calculus. 

But then, this is also the predicament arising out of the difficulties that arise in the US having to deal with multiple issues at the same time with Iran. If Tehran would have hoped that its ‘more-cooperative’ and ‘more-forthcoming’ attitude in the nuclear negotiations so far may produce gains on other issues (such as Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq and so on) – or vice versa – that isn’t happening – at least, not yet. 

An unnamed «senior US official» was extensively quoted by the American media on Monday as insisting that the negotiations on Syria and Iran’s nuclear program are separate and that Washington still has concerns about Iran’s support for terrorism and its «efforts to destabilize Lebanon, Bahrain and other countries in the region». 

So, how does the ‘score card’ look just as the Geneva 2 gets under way, finally? Paradoxically, now that the US ‘won’ the foreplay to keep out Iran, pressure builds up on it to ‘deliver’ as the peace process struggles to take off. The Geneva 2 cannot be allowed to flounder just like that. 

Certainly, failure won’t look good for the UN’s standing, either. Most certainly, the SNC had its way regarding Iran, but it cannot hope to dictate terms all the time – especially when it sits down facing the Syrian government delegation across the table. 

In the domestic opinion in the US, too, the Obama cannot afford a stark failure at Wednesday’s conference, given the constant sniping at his Syria policies. Something needs to be salvaged. 

Conceivably, Russia may just have ‘won’ its battle to get a peace process going at all on Syria.

 
Tags: UN Iran Middle East Saudi Arabia Syria US
 

 
Rating: 4.2 (13)      Your rating: 1 2 3 4 5     
 
Send by e-mail

Социальные комментарии Cackle
Comments
 
To add a comment, Login or Register
 
 
 
OUR COLUMNIST
    Andrei VOLODIN

Italy – Russia: Peace Geopolitics in Eurasia

The international conference «The Great Infrastructure of Eurasia: New Industrialization and Geopolitics of Peace» (Le Grandi Infrastrutture Euro-Asiatiche: Nuova Industrializzazione e Geopolitica Della Pace) took place in Rome on November 27-28, 2014. It leaves the impression that Europe has begun to mull its future relationship with Russia. Pepe Escobar, a well-known international relations analyst, has said that Russia is wired for «playing the long game with the West» with tangible results to appear on «the grand chessboard» after some time. That is something to agree with. At that there is something more important in question than just a game to play or, perhaps, this is a game with a win-win outcome...

27.12.2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAGS
 
 
 
Aeroflot AFISMA African Union Africom AIPAC Al Qaeda Al Shabaab Al-Jazeera ALBA Amnesty International Anonymous APEC Arab League ASEAN ATAKA Atomstroyexport Bank for International Settlements Bank of America Barclays Basel Committee BBC Bilderberg Club Black Bloc Blackwater Boco Haram BP BRICS CELAC Center for Responsive Politics CEPAL Chevron CIA CICA CIS Citigroup CNN Committee of 147 Committee of 300 Council of Europe Council on Foreign Relations Crescent Crescent Petroleum CSTO Customs Union DARPA Davos DEA Defense Intelligence Agency DIA Dragon Family E.ON Eager Lion ECOWAS EDA ELNET Enbridge Pipelines ETA EU EULEX EurAsEc Eurasian Union European Commission European Court of Human Rights European Union Exxon Mobil Facebook FAO FARC FATAH FBI FDA Federal Reserve FIFA Financial Action Task Force Financial Stability Board Fitch Franklin Templeton Freedom House FRS FSB FTA FUEN G-4 G20 G7 G8 GATA Gazprom GECF Glonass Goldman Sachs Google Greenpeace GUAM Guardian Gulf Cooperation Council Hague Tribunal HAMAS Heritage Foundation Hezbollah Hizb ut-Tahrir HSBC Human Rights Watch IAEA IEA IHRC IMF International Criminal Court Interpol IOC ISAF Islamic jihad Islamic Revolution Guards Corps ITERA Jamestown JP Morgan Jundullah KFOR KLA Ku Klux Klan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam Lukoil Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mercosur Microsoft Missile defense Missile Defense Agency Moody's Morgan Stanley Mossad Most-Favoured Nation Mujahedin-e Khalq Muslim Brotherhood Nabucco Naftogaz NASA Nation of Islam National Security Agency NATO NDAA NDI NED Non-aligned Movement NORAD Nord Stream NORTHCOM Northern Distribution Network NSA OECD Oerlikon OIC OPCW OPEC Open Government Partnership Organization of American States OSCE OTW movement OUN / UPA PACE PACOM Pan-Europa movement Pentagon PJAK PKK PRISM PYD Red Cross Renova Republican Party Rosatom Roscosmos Rosneft Rosoboronexport Ruhrgas RusAl RWE SABSA Scientology Shanghai Cooperation Organization Shell Siemens South Stream Southern Command Standard & Poor's Statoil Strategic Nuclear Forces Stratfor SWF SWIFT Syrian National Council SYRIZA Taliban Tamarod TAPI TeleSur TNK-BP Total Transneft TTIP Twitter UN UN International Court UNASUR UNESCO USAID Valdai Club Visegrad Group Wall Street Westinghouse Wikileaks World Bank WTO Yukos “Mass Atrocity Response Operations”
 
 
 

Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.


 

 

 
 
© Strategic Culture Foundation

RSS

Main Politics History&Culture Archive Authors Popular
  Economics Columns About Contact

Яндекс.Метрика

 

Melkulangara BHADRAKUMAR

Former career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service. Devoted much of his 3-decade long career to the Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran desks in the Ministry of External Affairs and in assignments on the territory of the former Soviet Union.  After leaving the diplomatic service, took to writing and contribute to The Asia Times, The Hindu and Deccan Herald. Lives in New Delhi.


all articles