Mobile version Today: 30.06.2015 Last update 08:19 | Select date RUS | ENG | SRB
 
 
home sitemap write a letter facebook twitter
Add to favourites RSS


ONLINE JOURNAL
About us
Authors
Contacts
    London Gold Fix Closed – Sign of Drastic Changes the World Financial System...  
    Nuland attempts Kiev Version 2.0 in Skopje  
    Mission Imperative: Why the West and Kiev Regime Must Kill the Truth  
  HOME PAGE WORLD BUSINESS HISTORY & CULTURE COLUMNISTS  
 
 
 
EDITOR'S CHOICE
 
Italy Could Bring Prosperity to the Mediterranean Nations
 
Shaking Off the Symbols of Racism
all articles
 
 
 
 
NEWS
 
 
US Training for 'Moderate' Syrian Rebels Fails, CIA Can't Find 'Moderates'...

28 people wounded in car bombing in Yemen’s capital...

Lavrov and Kerry to discuss fighting Islamic State in Vienna...

Political agenda to be gaining weight in BRICS — expert...

Revealed: NSA Conducted Massive Economic Espionage Against France...

Gazprom and Transneft included into extended sanction list — Canada’s Foreign Ministry...

Moscow condemns killing of Egypt’s state prosecutor Hisham Barakat...

Israel intercepts & escorts Gaza flotilla flagship, RT columnist aboard...

Signing of AIIB agreement is historic step: President Xi...

Seven arrests made over Tunisia attack...

FBI: Neo-Nazis Enlist in US Military to Train for Future Race War...

Afghanistan orders probe into NATO-led operation...

​Russian cosmonaut Padalka sets world spaceflight duration record...

​US a surveillance superpower spying on foes & allies alike – Assange...

Iran, Sextet do not manage the agreement by June 30 - diplomatic source...

all news
 
 
 
FACEBOOK
 
 

 

 
 
 
back print
 

Iran participation in Geneva II conference still undecided

News | 15.01.2014 | 06:02
 

Slightly more than a week to go until the international conference on Syria in Montreux (Switzerland) that is scheduled for January 22, there is still no certainly concerning Iranian delegation’s participation in it. Thus, the United States insists that Tehran should not be invited to the forum that is intended to launch the political settlement process. This has been confirmed, in particular, by Marie Harf, deputy spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of State. According to her, Secretary of State John Kerry had not invited Iran to attend the Geneva II conference when he was speaking at a news conference in Paris on Monday with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and the UN and League of Arab States Joint Special Representative for Syria, Lakhdar Brahimi. She stressed that the U.S. position on Iran’s possible participation in the conference had not changed. “Iran would need to publicly accept the Geneva I communiquй in order to be considered for participation at the ministerial level.” Geneva I was a meeting of the Action Group for Syria with the participation of Russia and the United States that was held on June 30, 2012. “We’ve also spoken in the last week about Iran possibly doing some things that would make the international community look more favourably on their participation in some way, but we have no indication they’re willing to do any of those things,” she said. The UN officials have other views. Thus, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon believes that the presence of Iranian representatives would be useful for the peace conference on Syria and is ready to extend an official invitation to Iran as soon as Russia and the United States agree on Iran’s participation in the forum. UN Secretary-General’s spokesman Martin Nesirky said that Lakhdar Brahimi also supported the idea to invite Iran to the conference. “We have consistently stated that Iran’s presence at these talks will be helpful,” Nesirky said. According to him, the Islamic Republic of Iran is “a regional power, capable of influencing the Syrian conflict settlement.” “The countries - initiators (of Geneva II), in other words, the United States and Russia, have discussed the issue of the participation of the Islamic Republic of Iran. If they find a formula that would make Iran’s participation possible, the invitation letter will be extended,” Nesirky said.

The long-sought international peace conference on Syria is set to begin on 22 January with a one-day meeting in the Swiss town of Montreux, the United Nations had stated previously. The conference, originally scheduled to take place in Geneva, will be held in two parts, with the opening session in Montreux, and, after a day’s break, moving on 24 January to the world body’s headquarters in Geneva. The conference will bring the Syrian government and the opposition to a negotiating table for the first time since the conflict started in March 2011.

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Monday that all influential players in the region, including Iran and Saudi Arabia, should be invited to the conference. This issue will be most likely discussed in the coming days when the Iranian and Syrian Foreign Ministers, Javad Zarif and Walid Muallem, will come to Moscow for talks with Lavrov. The visits will take place on January 16 and 17, respectively.

Among the important regional players is also Lebanon, which, according to Foreign Minister Adnan Mansour, attaches major importance to Iran’s participation in the Geneva II conference, taking into account the weighty role Iran plays in the Middle East. He stressed the similarity of the positions of Beirut and Tehran on the Syrian conflict that “negatively affects the situation in the whole region.” According to Mansour, the spread of terrorism is the largest threat and it has already affected Lebanon.

On Sunday, Zarif reiterated Iran’s stance. He stated that Iran would participate in Geneva II if it “receives an invitations without any preconditions” regarding its presence. “We support any initiative, aimed at stopping the conflict in Syria and believe that a mechanism for a political settlement of the crisis should be worked out in Geneva,” said the Iranian foreign minister. “The best way that would make it possible to curb terrorism and religious fanaticism is to give the Syrians an opportunity to take a free vote at elections,” Zarif stressed.

ITAR-TASS

 
Tags: UN Iran Russia Zarif
 

 
Rating: 0 (0)      Your rating: 1 2 3 4 5     
 
Send by e-mail

Социальные комментарии Cackle
Comments
 
To add a comment, Login or Register
 
 
 
OUR COLUMNIST
    Andrei AKULOV

Russia’s Statements on Boosting Strategic Forces Potential: Reason for Concern or Pretext to Escalate Tension

The issue gets hot, ballyhoo is raised, warnings are made and tensions are high. Is there a reason for real concern or it’s all just much ado about nothing? Russia's military this year alone will receive over 40 new intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of penetrating any missile defenses, President Vladimir Putin said on June 16. He made the statement at the opening of the opening of the Army-2015 international military show in Kubinka, outside Moscow. «We will be forced to aim our armed forces ... at those territories from where the threat comes», Putin said...

30.06.2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAGS
 
 
 
Aeroflot AFISMA African Union Africom AIIB AIPAC Al Qaeda Al Shabaab Al-Jazeera ALBA Amnesty International Anonymous Ansar Allah APEC Arab League ASEAN ATAKA Atomstroyexport Bank for International Settlements Bank of America Barclays Basel Committee BBC Bilderberg Club Black Bloc BlackRock Blackwater Boco Haram BP BRICS CARICOM CELAC Center for Responsive Politics CEPAL Chatham House Chevron CIA CICA CIS Citigroup CNN Committee of 147 Committee of 300 Council of Europe Council on Foreign Relations Crescent Crescent Petroleum CSTO Customs Union CyberBerkut DARPA Davos DEA Defense Intelligence Agency DIA Dragon Family E.ON Eager Lion ECOWAS EDA ELNET Enbridge Pipelines ETA EU EULEX EurAsEc Eurasian Union European Commission European Court of Human Rights European Union Exxon Mobil Facebook FAO FARC FATAH FBI FDA Federal Reserve FIFA Financial Action Task Force Financial Stability Board Fitch FIVE EYES Franklin Templeton Freedom House FRS FSB FTA FUEN G-4 G20 G7 G8 GATA Gazprom GCHQ GECF Glonass Goldman Sachs Google Green Group Greenpeace GUAM Guardian Gulf Cooperation Council Hague Tribunal HAMAS Heritage Foundation Hezbollah Hizb ut-Tahrir HSBC Human Rights Watch IAEA IEA IHRC IMF International Criminal Court Interpol IOC ISAF Islamic jihad Islamic Revolution Guards Corps ITERA Jamestown Jobbik JP Morgan Jundullah KFOR KLA Ku Klux Klan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam Lukoil Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mercosur Microsoft Missile defense Missile Defense Agency Monsanto Moody's Morgan Stanley Mossad Most-Favoured Nation Mujahedin-e Khalq Muslim Brotherhood Nabucco NAFTA Naftogaz NASA Nation of Islam National Security Agency NATO NDAA NDI NED Non-aligned Movement NORAD Nord Stream NORTHCOM Northern Distribution Network NSA OECD Oerlikon OIC OPCW OPEC Open Government Partnership Organization of American States OSCE OTW movement OUN / UPA PACE PACOM Pan-Europa movement Pegida Pentagon PJAK PKK Podemos PRISM PYD Red Cross Renova Republican Party Rosatom Roscosmos Rosneft Rosoboronexport Ruhrgas RusAl RWE SABSA Scientology Shanghai Cooperation Organization Shell Siemens South Stream Southern Command Standard & Poor's Statoil Strategic Nuclear Forces Stratfor SWF SWIFT Syrian National Council SYRIZA Taliban Tamarod TAPI TeleSur TNK-BP Total Transneft TTIP Turkish Stream Twitter UN UN International Court UNASUR UNESCO UNICEF USAID Valdai Club Visegrad Group Wall Street Westinghouse WHO Wikileaks World Bank WTO Yukos “Mass Atrocity Response Operations”
 
 
 

Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.


 

 

 
 
© Strategic Culture Foundation

RSS

Main Politics History&Culture Archive Authors Popular
  Economics Columns About Contact