Mobile version Today: 28.11.2015 Last update 20:47 | Select date
home sitemap write a letter facebook twitter
Add to favourites RSS

About us
    London Gold Fix Closed – Sign of Drastic Changes the World Financial System...  
    Nuland attempts Kiev Version 2.0 in Skopje  
    Mission Imperative: Why the West and Kiev Regime Must Kill the Truth  
Class, War And David Cameron. “Keep our Country Safe,… Military Action against ISIS”
The Bitter Fruit of ‘Bibi-ism’
all articles
Turkish businesses ring tocsins - Russian presidential press secretary...

Russia has right to military response to Turkey's "criminal act": Duma chairman...

Planned Parenthood: Three die in shooting at Colorado clinic...

Japan to resume whaling in Antarctic despite court ruling...

US presses Turkey to deploy troops to Syria border...

Tens of Militants Surrender to Syrian Gov't in Lattakia Province...

UK may be prosecuted over missiles used by Saudis in Yemen war...

Interview: UN chief says "optimistic" about success of Paris conference on climate change...

Israel troops injure 82 more Palestinians in W Bank, Gaza...

Lavrov hits Turkey with more penalties, doubts commitment to war on “secret allies” ISIL...

Turkey, Russia remain defiant amid strained ties over warplane downing...

EU says charges against Turkey journalists 'worrying'...

Syria, Russia Block Cross-Border Weapons Supply to ISIL in Lattakia...

Prudence will solve Russia-Turkey row over downed jet: Iran FM...

China Headlines: China's peace commitment unchanged after military reshuffle...

all news


back print

As al Qaeda revives, Iraq struggles to secure Syria border

News | 15.01.2014 | 06:51
Iraq is struggling to tighten control of its border with Syria, alarmed by a resurgent al Qaeda force that seeks to build an Islamic state across a frontier drawn in colonial times.
The Baghdad government has deployed troops and new U.S.- and Russian-made weaponry to try and cut the militants' cross-border supply lines, hoping that can kill off the threat. But as U.S. forces found before them, it is a near-impossible task.
The Syrian civil war that has inflamed sectarian tensions across the region, and a desolate geography favoring smugglers and guerrillas are just two of Baghdad's difficulties in getting a firm grip on the 600-km (375-mile) desert boundary.
Another is tribal ties that span the border, with Iraqis regularly sending food, supplies and weapons to Syrian relatives enduring that country's war. Iraq says Sunni Islamists have gone back and forth from Syria during the conflict.
Some local people, like desert tribesmen elsewhere, are reluctant even to recognize international borders.
Crucially, political and sectarian animosities felt by the Sunni population of the western province of Anbar towards the Shi'ite-led central government weaken its authority there.
"It's not winnable, to control this part of Iraq's borders," said Mustafa Alani, an Iraqi analyst at the Gulf Research Centre think-tank, referring to Anbar and its neighbor to the north, Nineveh.
"Even the Americans couldn't do it," he said, referring to the U.S. occupation of Iraq from 2003 to 2011.
Al Qaeda-linked militants, feeding off widespread Sunni resentment at perceived mistreatment by Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government, swept into the Anbar cities of Falluja and Ramadi on January 1. Ramadi is now back under government control.
Maliki is trying to enlist tribal support to stamp out al Qaeda's latest incarnation in Iraq and Syria, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), whose rise has helped drive violence back to the worst level in at least five years.
His task is unusually complicated, for ISIL, which announced its formation in 2013 out of pre-existing groups, operates on both sides of the border, fighting the governments of both Maliki and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Maliki said Iraqi border forces had reduced the passage of al Qaeda fighters, weapons and smugglers. "But we have not been able so far to close all the crossing points they can infiltrate due to the difficult environmental and geographic conditions," he told Reuters in an interview this week.
"There are also border cities which are half-Iraqi, half Syrian and their tribes have family connections, they are cousins."
The size of Anbar - comprising a third of Iraq's territory and bordering Syria, Saudi Arabia and Jordan - means that tenuous control of its borders is an important vulnerability.
"ISIL's expansion in Syria ... has offered a tremendous platform to recruit, train and fundraise in ways that positioned the group to both stoke and exploit sectarian tensions in Iraq," Brian Fishman wrote for the Combating Terrorism Center, a research unit at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.
The Syrian-Iraqi border was drawn in the 1920s, when colonial powers France and Britain carved the two countries out of the remnants of the Ottoman empire after World War One.
Almost a century on, much of it remains just a line on a map.
There are two major border crossings between Iraq and Syria, one in Anbar and one in Nineveh, northwest of the city of Mosul. They are manned by Iraqi forces and fortified with blast walls, barbed wire and watchtowers.
But many minor Iraqi posts in between consist only of small, single-storey buildings with a watchtower and staffed by half a dozen security personnel.
These posts can be as much as 10 km (six miles) apart and their defenders have only light weapons and a single military vehicle, security officials said. Border guards there lack the equipment needed to monitor the frontier properly, they said.
The border in Anbar, usually patrolled by just a few thousand guards, is mostly open expanses of desert and scrub that allow ISIL fighters easy access to rear bases in Syria.
Hillsides, hidden caves and tracks have made the region a haven for smugglers for generations - and more recently for militants.
After the U.S. invasion in 2003, the border became a source of tension as an anti-American, Sunni insurgency mounted.
Iraq and the United States often accused Syria of allowing insurgents to cross the border, a charge denied by Damascus.
No one doubts that Sunni fighters flow both ways today. Some Iraqi Shi'ites are also in Syria fighting for Assad's forces.
Maliki said his government had banned the involvement of Iraqis in Syria. "We absolutely refuse to be involved in the crisis in any way," he said. "No weapons, no supplies and no fighters."
The border area features large cave systems and valleys, several of which extend for dozens of miles across the border and are used by ISIL to set up training camps, living quarters and arms depots, Iraqi security sources say.
Alarmed by the contagion spreading from Syria's war, the government launched Operation Iron Hammer on December 23 to try to break the link between ISIL in Iraq and Syria.
"We want to separate the two frontiers, as each is feeding off the other," said a senior security official in Baghdad.
Iraqi forces used Russian Mi-35 attack helicopters for the first time, as well as warplanes and U.S. Hellfire missiles supplied after Maliki visited Washington in November.
"When we cut off its funds and support by blocking the route from Iraq to Syria, al Qaeda will be finished in Syria, as it will be in Iraq," the security official said.
Iraqi military officers say the new weaponry, as well as satellite imagery and other U.S.-supplied intelligence, has given them new capabilities to hit a previously elusive enemy.
"There was some hesitation among the Americans with regard to providing us with light and heavy weapons," Maliki said.
"But after the wisdom shown by Iraq in dealing with the recent crisis ... everyone rushed, Congress and the U.S. administration, and asked us to provide a list of weapons we need to fight the terrorist gangs and al Qaeda organizations."
But the extent to which Iraq's military campaign in Anbar border regions has damaged ISIL remains uncertain.
Tags: Al Qaeda Iraq Syria

Rating: 5.0 (1)      Your rating: 1 2 3 4 5     
Send by e-mail

To add a comment, Login or Register

Turkey Paves Way for Another Cuban Crisis

Turkey has downed a Russian SU-24 Fencer bomber which posed no threat to its security. This act of provocation against Russia is unprecedented in the modern history. It greatly exacerbates the global situation. It also proves the existence of a very dangerous geopolitical trend directly related to the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, which have already become NATO or EU members, or cherish the dream of joining these organizations (often at any price)...

Aeroflot AFISMA African Union Africom AIIB AIPAC Al Qaeda Al Shabaab Al-Jazeera ALBA Amnesty International Anonymous Ansar Allah APEC Arab League ASEAN ATAKA Atomstroyexport Bank for International Settlements Bank of America Barclays Basel Committee BBC Bilderberg Club Black Bloc BlackRock Blackwater BND Boco Haram BP BRICS CARICOM CELAC Center for Responsive Politics CEPAL Chatham House Chevron CIA CICA CIS Citigroup CNN Committee of 147 Committee of 300 Council of Europe Council on Foreign Relations Crescent Crescent Petroleum CSTO Customs Union CyberBerkut DARPA Davos DEA Defense Intelligence Agency DIA Dragon Family E.ON Eager Lion ECOWAS EDA ELNET Enbridge Pipelines ETA EU EULEX EurAsEc Eurasian Union European Commission European Court of Human Rights European Union Exxon Mobil Facebook FAO FARC FATAH FBI FDA Federal Reserve FIFA Financial Action Task Force Financial Stability Board Fitch FIVE EYES Franklin Templeton Freedom House FRS FSB FTA FUEN G-4 G20 G7 G8 GATA Gazprom GCHQ GECF Gladio Glonass Goldman Sachs Google Green Group Greenpeace GUAM Guardian Gulf Cooperation Council Hague Tribunal HAMAS Heritage Foundation Hezbollah Hizb ut-Tahrir Hollywood HSBC Human Rights Watch IAEA IEA IHRC IMF International Criminal Court Interpol IOC ISAF Islamic jihad Islamic Revolution Guards Corps ITERA Jamestown Jobbik JP Morgan Jundullah KFOR KLA Ku Klux Klan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam Lukoil Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mercosur Microsoft Missile defense Missile Defense Agency Monsanto Moody's Morgan Stanley Mossad Most-Favoured Nation Mujahedin-e Khalq Muslim Brotherhood Nabucco NAFTA Naftogaz NASA Nation of Islam National Security Agency NATO NDAA NDI NED Non-aligned Movement NORAD Nord Stream NORTHCOM Northern Distribution Network NSA OECD Oerlikon OIC OPCW OPEC Open Government Partnership Organization of American States OSCE OTW movement OUN / UPA PACE PACOM Pan-Europa movement Pegida Pentagon PJAK PKK Podemos PRISM PYD Red Cross Renova Republican Party Rosatom Roscosmos Rosneft Rosoboronexport Ruhrgas RusAl RWE SABSA Scientology Shanghai Cooperation Organization Shell Siemens South Stream Southern Command Standard & Poor's Statoil Strategic Nuclear Forces Stratfor SWF SWIFT Syrian National Council SYRIZA Taliban Tamarod TAPI TeleSur TNK-BP Total Trans-Pacific Partnership Transneft TTIP TTP Turkish Stream Twitter UN UN International Court UNASUR UNESCO UNICEF USAID Valdai Club Visegrad Group Volkswagen Wall Street Westinghouse WHO Wikileaks World Bank WTO Yukos “Mass Atrocity Response Operations”

Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal



© Strategic Culture Foundation


Main Politics History&Culture Archive Authors Popular
  Economics Columns About Contact