Mobile version Today: 18.12.2014 Last update 08:24 | Select date RUS | ENG | SRB
 
 
home sitemap write a letter facebook twitter
Add to favourites RSS


ONLINE JOURNAL
About us
Authors
Contacts
    Russia Confronts US’ Containment Strategy  
    Otto von Bismarck’s Epistle to Angela Merkel  
    Obama Launches His War, Finally  
  HOME PAGE WORLD BUSINESS HISTORY & CULTURE COLUMNISTS  
 
 
 
EDITOR'S CHOICE
 
After Ukraine: Are the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary Veering Off The NATO/EU Reservation?
 
Sabotaging an Iran Nuke Deal
all articles
 
 
 
 
NEWS
 
 
US Ready to Discuss INF Treaty Issue, Russia ‘Unwilling’: Official...

EU losing trust in Ukraine...

Serbia and Russia continue cooperation despite complicated international situation...

Ukraine looks to Poland’s support on reforms - Poroshenko...

Moscow, Tehran Have Power to Prevent Foreign Invasion to Syria: Official...

Obama Announces Major Shift in Cuban Policy...

UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine report distorts facts - Russian FM...

Turkey rejects EU criticism over media arrests...

NATO doubles number of flights near Russian borders - Russia top brass...

Iran's president reaffirms support for Syria's Assad...

European Union Supports Terrorism, Deeply Involved in “Plot Targeting Syria”...

New Russian sanctions bill to be signed by end of week – White House...

ISIS’ Bloody Footprints Lead From NATO Territory...

Islamists of Libya's Darna form coalition to against army attacks...

Poroshenko: conflict in eastern Ukraine can be settled only on basis of Minsk agreements...

all news
 
 
 
FACEBOOK
 
 

 

 
 
 
back print
 

"Bubbles" Starting to Form in the Financial Markets

Valentin KATASONOV | 20.11.2013 | 00:00 Comments: 1
 

A recently published study from the bank JPMorgan gives an overview of changes in the world money supply in recent years. In just the first three quarters of this year the world money supply, as measured by the M2 aggregate, grew from 63 to 66 trillion dollars.

The M2 monetary aggregate includes cash, non-cash money in current accounts, fixed-term and savings deposits, and short-term government securities. This means that in less than a year the world money supply grew by 3 trillion dollars, or 4.6%. It has reached almost 100 percent of the annual world GDP. According to the estimates of specialists at JPMorgan, approximately 1 trillion out of these 3 trillion dollars came from the group called the G4: the U.S., Great Britain, the Eurozone (17 European countries) and Japan The other 2 trillion dollars came from the other countries of the "golden billion" (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and 10 countries of the European Union) and countries on the periphery of world capitalism. These giant infusions into the world economy create the illusion of, if not economic growth, then at least some kind of economic stability. However, it is nothing but an illusion, since the official GDP figures published by national statistics services embellish the real state of affairs. Adjusted for inflationary price increases, the real world GDP is either not increasing, or is gradually decreasing. The other side of this process is the imperceptible but consistent decrease in the purchasing power of the currencies of various countries. Simply put, money is depreciating.

It is not difficult to figure out, based on the JPMorgan assessments, that for all of 2013 the growth of the world money supply could reach at least 6 percent. Several months ago the international auditing company Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) presented a forecast of the development of the world economy in 2013 (Global Economy Watch 2013). According to the company's estimates, the growth of GDP in the world will be 3.3% (2.0% in the U.S.). If one compares the estimates in the JPMorganstudy and the data in the Global Economy Watch 2013forecast, it is not difficult to understand that the rapid growth of the world money supply in recent years is creating the illusion of economic development. Amid rampant monetarism, statistics services do not measure changes in the production and consumption of goods and services, but simply record the growth of the money supply.

***

The world money supply is growing mostly thanks to the U.S. Federal Reserve System, which after the financial crisis took up a policy of so-called "quantitative easing" (QE) in the economy, stating that the American economy needs to be revived, and thus it needs a boost in the form of cheap money. And money becomes cheap when there's a lot of it.

Not long ago a key thesis of financial science was the principle of the balanced budget, and using the printing press to plug financial holes was seen as sacrilege. Today in America they are trying to forget about this thesis. And not only in America; there are programs analogous to quantitative easing today in Great Britain, Japan and Europe. On an annualized basis, the money supply produced as part of the American QE program is around 1 trillion dollars. The printing presses of many central banks besides the Fed are also at work, especially that of the European Central Bank (ECB), which has begun a program of buying the debt securities of individual Eurozone countries.

The Federal Reserve has already implemented two QE programs, and a third was launched in September of last year. It calls for the Federal Reserve to provide a monthly money supply in the amount of approximately 85 billion dollars. The money enters the economy through the purchase of securities: approximately 45 billion dollars in U.S. Treasury securities and 40 billion dollars in various "junk" (mostly mortgage-backed) securities from banks. Thus the quantitative easing program is aimed at boosting not the real sector of the economy, but the U.S. government and the banking sector.Of course, the Fed's money can make its way into the real sector of the economy eventually, but not right away and in very limited quantities. Where does it go first? In the case of the purchase of treasury securities, the money goes to military expenditures and paying interest on the state debt. In the case of the purchase of "junk" securities, it goes into the financial markets. It is unlikely that such a "boost" will help the American economy completely overcome the consequences of the financial crisis. It is more likely that, on the contrary, it will create conditions for a new one.

Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke has already made several cautious statements that the QE program might begin to taper off. Of course, he always added: if the U.S. economy shows signs of rallying. These statements always caused agitation among financial market participants; they understood the consequences of a drop in the revolutions of the printing press. By autumn 2013 not even the most inveterate optimists had any hope that the U.S. economy would rally. And Bernanke stopped frightening everyone with talk of tapering off the QE program. And really, why should he start that kind of experimentation so close to the end of his career as the chairman of the Federal Reserve?

The real economy of the U.S. has not recovered from the financial crisis,but there are clear signs that bubbles are forming on the financial markets. This is very reminiscent of the situation in the late 1990s. Many investors and financial analysts believe that the Federal Reserve is not saving the American economy; it is pumping up financial bubbles which one of these days will burst. The consequences of their "popping" will be much worse than the consequences of the crisis on U.S. markets at the turn of this century. At that time there were countries with so-called "transitional" economies which served as a safety valve for many investors on the American securities market. Today the situation in countries on the periphery of world capitalism (PWC) is extremely unfavorable. Any scaling back of the American quantitative easing program could lead to the most catastrophic of consequences in these countries. The ministers of finance and even the prime ministers of several PWC countries are asking Washington and even the chairman of the Fed personally not to taper the QE program. For example, in late August of this year the governors of the People's Bank of China (PBC) and the government of the People's Republic of China showed great concern about Ben Bernanke's statements on the tapering off of the QE program and proposed a special discussion of this issue at the G20 summit in St. Petersburg September 5-6. Of course, discussion of the issue was cut short because Syria came to the forefront in St. Petersburg. In a word, the end of quantitative easing could turn into a rough economic "landing" for countries on the periphery of world capitalism.

***

The formation of bubbles which has begun on America's securities markets means that stocks circulating on the market and financial instruments linked to real assets are losing their connection to the situation in the real sector of the economy. The economy is running in place or even going down, but stock market quotes are moving in the opposite direction. This theater of the absurd is supported by the Federal Reserve and its quantitative easing program...

Many media outlets have quoted former Federal Reserve governor  Robert Heller, who has stated in no uncertain terms that the stock market is "perilously close" to a new bubble, while the Fed's asset buying program has not had a noticeably positive influence on the real economy. The statement of Lawrence Fink, CEO of Blackrock, the world's largest money management company with assets of over 4 trillion dollars, did not go unnoticed either. He also confirmed that a bubble is starting to form on the U.S. stock market.

A more detailed explanation of the situation was given by Michael Gayed, chief investment strategist at investment advisers Pension Partners. He noted the similarity of the current U.S. market environment to that of the late 1990s. At that time there were massive gains followed by a catastrophic drop in the indices on the NASDAQ exchange, where stocks for high-tech companies are traded. He emphasized that the Dow Jones, S&P 500 and Russell 2000 indices once again reached record highs in late October. In addition, the trend toward an increasing gap between the state of the real sector of the U.S. economy and stock and securities prices leaps to the eye.  A key indicator of this gap is the ratio of a stock's price (the current market capitalization of the company) to the company's real return. This P/E (price/earnings) ratio has been skyrocketing for a number of stocks in the U.S. in autumn 2013. Like in the late 1990s, the P/E ratio record holders are high-tech companies, especially in the telecommunications and Internet fields. These are companies with very big names: Facebook, LinkedIn, Yelp, Pandora andTesla. The P/E for LinkedIn is 746, for Tesla it is 267, and for Facebook it is 120. The head of Tesla, Elon Musk, admitted in an interview with Bloomberg that the current level of the company's stock price is "more than we have any right to deserve".

As the authors of the JPMorgan study have noted, some investors are already beginning to get out of stocks and reinvest in other assets, for example, in treasury securities. As an example, they cite one of the largest sovereign wealth funds in the world, the Government Pension Fund of Norway (800 billion dollars). For instance, in the third quarter of this year it stopped buying stock, becoming purely a seller. At the moment 63.6% of the fund's assets are stocks, which is greater than the target of 60%. It is logical to expect further sales. In the opinion of the JPMorgan experts, other sovereign wealth funds, which belong to the category of conservative investors, will follow suit. These are the first swallows, harbingers of the coming financial storm.

 
Tags: Federal Reserve JP Morgan US
 

 
Rating: 5.0 (13)      Your rating: 1 2 3 4 5     
 
Send by e-mail

Социальные комментарии Cackle
Comments
 
To add a comment, Login or Register
 
 
 
OUR COLUMNIST
    Paul Craig ROBERTS

Financial Market Manipulation Is The New Trend: Can It Continue?

Governments and economists take their hats off to free markets.  Yet, the markets are rigged, not free. ... No country dependent on foreign capital is sovereign.  A country dependent on foreign capital, especially from enemies seeking to subvert the economy, is subject to destabilizing currency and economic swings.  Russia should self-finance. ...The greatest harm that is being done to the Russian economy is not due to sanctions and the US attack on the ruble.  The greatest harm is being done by Russia’s neoliberal economists. Neoliberal economics is not merely incorrect.  It is an ideology that fosters US economic imperialism. ... If Russia is to survive, Putin must protect Russia from Western economic institutions and Western trained economists. 

18.12.2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAGS
 
 
 
Aeroflot AFISMA African Union Africom AIPAC Al Qaeda Al Shabaab Al-Jazeera ALBA Amnesty International Anonymous APEC Arab League ASEAN ATAKA Atomstroyexport Bank for International Settlements Bank of America Barclays Basel Committee BBC Bilderberg Club Black Bloc Blackwater Boco Haram BP BRICS CELAC Center for Responsive Politics CEPAL Chevron CIA CICA CIS Citigroup CNN Committee of 147 Committee of 300 Council of Europe Council on Foreign Relations Crescent Crescent Petroleum CSTO Customs Union DARPA Davos DEA Defense Intelligence Agency DIA Dragon Family E.ON Eager Lion ECOWAS EDA ELNET Enbridge Pipelines ETA EU EULEX EurAsEc Eurasian Union European Commission European Court of Human Rights European Union Exxon Mobil Facebook FAO FARC FATAH FBI FDA Federal Reserve FIFA Financial Action Task Force Financial Stability Board Fitch Franklin Templeton Freedom House FRS FSB FTA FUEN G-4 G20 G7 G8 GATA Gazprom GECF Glonass Goldman Sachs Google Greenpeace GUAM Guardian Gulf Cooperation Council Hague Tribunal HAMAS Heritage Foundation Hezbollah Hizb ut-Tahrir HSBC Human Rights Watch IAEA IEA IHRC IMF International Criminal Court Interpol IOC ISAF Islamic jihad Islamic Revolution Guards Corps ITERA Jamestown JP Morgan Jundullah KFOR KLA Ku Klux Klan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam Lukoil Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mercosur Microsoft Missile defense Missile Defense Agency Moody's Morgan Stanley Mossad Most-Favoured Nation Mujahedin-e Khalq Muslim Brotherhood Nabucco Naftogaz NASA Nation of Islam National Security Agency NATO NDAA NDI NED Non-aligned Movement NORAD Nord Stream NORTHCOM Northern Distribution Network NSA OECD Oerlikon OIC OPCW OPEC Open Government Partnership Organization of American States OSCE OTW movement OUN / UPA PACE PACOM Pan-Europa movement Pentagon PJAK PKK PRISM PYD Red Cross Renova Republican Party Rosatom Roscosmos Rosneft Rosoboronexport Ruhrgas RusAl RWE SABSA Scientology Shanghai Cooperation Organization Shell Siemens South Stream Southern Command Standard & Poor's Statoil Strategic Nuclear Forces Stratfor SWF SWIFT Syrian National Council SYRIZA Taliban Tamarod TAPI TeleSur TNK-BP Total Transneft TTIP Twitter UN UN International Court UNASUR UNESCO USAID Valdai Club Visegrad Group Wall Street Westinghouse Wikileaks World Bank WTO Yukos “Mass Atrocity Response Operations”
 
 
 

Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.


 

 

 
 
© Strategic Culture Foundation

RSS

Main Politics History&Culture Archive Authors Popular
  Economics Columns About Contact

Яндекс.Метрика

 

Valentin KATASONOV

D.Sc. (Economics), Economist and the chairman of the S.F. Sharapov Russian Economic Society


all articles