Mobile version Today: 14.10.2015 Last update 00:02 | Select date
home sitemap write a letter facebook twitter
Add to favourites RSS

About us
    London Gold Fix Closed – Sign of Drastic Changes the World Financial System...  
    Nuland attempts Kiev Version 2.0 in Skopje  
    Mission Imperative: Why the West and Kiev Regime Must Kill the Truth  
Imperial Failure: Lessons From Afghanistan and Iraq
Russia Supplants U.S. in Global War Against Jihadists
all articles
Some partners have mush for brains, Putin says on US's Syria policies...

Russian president calls US bluff on fighting Daesh terrorists: Analyst ...

Clinton and Sanders to face off in first Democratic debate...

Iran parliament backs nuclear deal with world powers...

Conditions at Czech refugee camp miserable: Rights observer...

Afghan Taliban admit Kunduz withdrawal...

CIA torture survivors sue psychologists who designed program...

White House says Iran's missile test may have violated U.N. resolution...

China, Britain to achieve rich results in Xi's visit...

Three Israelis killed in Jerusalem attacks...

Russian FM calls on 'interested' parties to join anti-terror information center...

MH17 Ukraine disaster: Dutch to report on cause...

Iran's parliament backs nuclear deal...

Anti-gov't protests erupt as Turkey mourns bombing victims...

Half of Democrats want Biden in race: Reuters/Ipsos poll...

all news


back print

The Eclipse of US Politics, and its Global Consequences

David KERANS | 06.08.2012 | 00:00

Polarization no. Extremism yes.

Since the time of DeTocqueville's Democracy in America, if not earlier, Americans have been aware of the tendency of their two-party system to restrain ideological polarization through an automatic process. In a two-party system, each of the parties is strongly impelled to adopt positions close to the current popular consensus, wherever that may lie. Should either one depart from the consensus on key issues, the other is likely to reap huge gains at the ballot box. The fact that the mass of Americans has long believed and trusted in the self-moderating mechanism of the two-party system accounts for the wave of lamentations over the last decade concerning a perceived slide into polarization. Common wisdom now sees the two parties as bitterly opposed, with the Republicans on the right and the Democrats on the left. With somewhat less conviction, mainstream political observers maintain that the nation is deeply divided along corresponding lines.

But the polarization of politics in the US is a myth. (1) While the parties have amplified their rhetorical venom against one another over the last decade, and while they have become more intransigent on policy questions that divide them, over the last few decades both of them have occupied positions increasingly off to the right, as measured on the spectrum of politics in developed nations over the course of the last 100 years. There is no Left at all in the US political establishment. Further, as surveys of popular opinion on key issues demonstrate with regularity, the two parties now stand well to the right of the electorate. It follows, therefore, that the self-moderating mechanism of the two-party system has broken down, and that the democratic dimension of the US system is nearly impotent. The explanation for this is no mystery: in the absence of regulations limiting spending in election campaigns, candidates depend ever more on donations from deep-pocketed individuals or corporations. In turn, politicians do the bidding of their donors, the lion's share of whom militate for policies that will transfer wealth upward. Inexorably, this dynamic has produced a degraded, extremist ideological climate that trumpets the virtues of the free market and maintains as much silence as is possible regarding government giveaways and corruption in favor of large corporations.

From Extremism to Theology

As disturbing as the ossification of the ideological climate of the US establishment over the last few decades has been, the financial crisis of 2008 seems to have triggered a devastating step downwards. The descent begins with denial of the realities of the market system in the US. Consider, first, that the financial crisis has generated a superabundance of evidence regarding the susceptibility of market institutions to corrupt rearrangement through government action. At the bidding of powerful special interests, both US parties have established a habit of shaping all manner of rules, structures, enforcement practices, and tax policies to enrich their donors. Yet, however plentiful journalistic and academic exposes of the perversion and disastrous malfunction of the system may be, neither party is willing to rethink the system. At best, the Democrats manage to despair over the current structure of the system, while stopping short of proposing genuine antidotes. The Republicans, for their part, have become immune to facts, and have chosen simply to parrot discredited pro-free market platitudes at higher volume, all while preparing ever more brazen transfers of wealth. (2) In effect, as Thomas Frank explains in Pity the Billionaire, free market extremism has now become free market theology. (3)

In these circumstances, the two parties are no longer capable even of debating systemic reforms, let alone pursuing them. This while the economy sputters, poverty spreads, new financial scandals and crises take shape, and the worst drought since at least the mid-1950s ravages the country and alerts us to the prospect of enormous or apocalyptic challenges from global warming. Fidel Castro had good reason to characterize the Republican Party's presidential candidate selection process as «the greatest competition of idiocy ever». (4)

Corporations at the Helm

Because the descent from free-market extremism to theology precludes the political establishment from approaching systemic issues honestly, progressive observers are emboldened to envision a third party or a grassroots movement like Occupy Wall Street rising up to lead the way forward. This is long overdue, of course, and we would welcome progress in this direction. Unfortunately for the US and the rest of the world, however, a very different kind of replacement for the political establishment has taken shape. Special interests appear to be graduating from their long-standing practice of lobbying for specific policies, to a point where they are formulating core positions of the government, with near total disregard for the two parties and their leaders. One example each from the state, national, and international policy levels will illustrate the trend.

Act 13

Now I know what it feels like to live in Nigeria. You’re basically a resource colony for multi-national corporations to take your natural resources, take them back to wherever they are at, add value to them, and then sell them back to you.»

- recently retired Pittsburgh City Council President Doug Shields

At the state level, consider Pennsylvania Act 13, which the oil and gas industry designed and the governor signed into law earlier this year. Act 13 peremptorily undermined all local regulations that might impede the exploitation of mineral resources (in Pennsylvania's case, shale gas is the prize), and shielded mineral extraction operations from liability for any wrongdoing or damage to the environment (such as contamination of water sources, a well established hazard of fracking). It was duly characterized as «possibly the nation's worst corporate giveaway». (5) The Pennsylvania State Supreme Court has voided Act 13, but we can expect the legislature to revive it in lightly adjusted form soon, and sister bills are making their way through at least four other statehouses, coordinated through the nefarious American Legislative Exchange Council. (6)

The CEO Budget Committee and the TPP

Next, it seems that CEOs from a number of major corporations have banded together to guide (that is, pressure, and heavily) Capitol Hill on restructuring the US budget, guidance which will include hefty cuts to the nation's largest non-military programs: medicare (government health insurance for the retired), medicaid (government medical support for the poor), and Social Security (federally delivered pensions). (7) Finally, consider the US's leadership in preparing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement with six Pacific nations, which is designed to grant corporations sweeping powers versus nation states that might cross their path in any way. Tellingly, the TPP will give foreign corporations all manner of powers to override the US government. It will, for instance:

Limit how U.S. federal and state officials could regulate foreign firms operating within U.S. boundaries, with requirements to provide them greater rights than domestic firms; establish a two-track legal system that gives foreign firms new rights to skirt U.S. courts and laws, directly sue the U.S. government before foreign tribunals and demand compensation for financial, health, environmental, land use and other laws they claim undermine their TPP privileges; and allow foreign firms to demand compensation for the costs of complying with U.S. financial or environmental regulations...» (8)

What we are witnessing is the eclipse of US politics. The political parties are fading away as centers of policy formulation, and are willfully stripping the government of its powers vis-a-vis business corporations. In pursuing this course, US political leaders are losing relevance as points of appeal. Financial crises will reoccur, commodity prices will gyrate out of control, global warming will imperil our ecosystem, all thanks in large part to US policies -- but the international community won't find any US politician who is able to do anything about it…


(1) Wikipedia's «Polarization (politics)» page provides a handy summary of the debate.

(2) Here the famous «Ryan Plan» is Exhibit A in a list we could extend endlessly.

(3) Thomas Frank, Pity the Billionaire: The Hard-Times Swindle and the Unlikely Comeback of the Right, Metropolitan Books, 2012.


(5) Steven Rosenfeld, «Fracking Democracy», AlterNet, March 7th, 2012.

(6) On Act 13, see e.g. Steve Horn, «Exposed: Pennsylvania Act 13 Overturned by Supreme Court, Originally an ALEC Bill», DeSmog Blog, July 27th, 2012.

(7) See, e.g. Dean Baker, «The CEO Plan to Steal Your Social Security and Medicare,» Common Dreams, July 30th, 2012.

(8) «US Trade Agreement Leak Reveals 'Radical New Powers' for Multinational Corporations,» Common Dreams, June 13th, 2012.

Tags: Republican Party

Rating: 4.8 (6)      Your rating: 1 2 3 4 5     
Send by e-mail

To add a comment, Login or Register
    Andrei AKULOV

Russia Upends Middle East Situation: New Reality, Reviewed Policies

The US puts an end to its training program of Syrian rebel forces and shifts to providing equipment and weapons to existing forces. Its $580m program was beset with a series of embarrassing setbacks and came under harsh criticism after it emerged that the rebels had handed hardware and ammunition over to extremists. “Probably 60 to 80 percent of the arms that America shoveled in have gone to al-Qaida and its affiliates,” said Joshua Landis, a Syria expert at the University of Oklahoma.  

Aeroflot AFISMA African Union Africom AIIB AIPAC Al Qaeda Al Shabaab Al-Jazeera ALBA Amnesty International Anonymous Ansar Allah APEC Arab League ASEAN ATAKA Atomstroyexport Bank for International Settlements Bank of America Barclays Basel Committee BBC Bilderberg Club Black Bloc BlackRock Blackwater Boco Haram BP BRICS CARICOM CELAC Center for Responsive Politics CEPAL Chatham House Chevron CIA CICA CIS Citigroup CNN Committee of 147 Committee of 300 Council of Europe Council on Foreign Relations Crescent Crescent Petroleum CSTO Customs Union CyberBerkut DARPA Davos DEA Defense Intelligence Agency DIA Dragon Family E.ON Eager Lion ECOWAS EDA ELNET Enbridge Pipelines ETA EU EULEX EurAsEc Eurasian Union European Commission European Court of Human Rights European Union Exxon Mobil Facebook FAO FARC FATAH FBI FDA Federal Reserve FIFA Financial Action Task Force Financial Stability Board Fitch FIVE EYES Franklin Templeton Freedom House FRS FSB FTA FUEN G-4 G20 G7 G8 GATA Gazprom GCHQ GECF Gladio Glonass Goldman Sachs Google Green Group Greenpeace GUAM Guardian Gulf Cooperation Council Hague Tribunal HAMAS Heritage Foundation Hezbollah Hizb ut-Tahrir Hollywood HSBC Human Rights Watch IAEA IEA IHRC IMF International Criminal Court Interpol IOC ISAF Islamic jihad Islamic Revolution Guards Corps ITERA Jamestown Jobbik JP Morgan Jundullah KFOR KLA Ku Klux Klan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam Lukoil Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mercosur Microsoft Missile defense Missile Defense Agency Monsanto Moody's Morgan Stanley Mossad Most-Favoured Nation Mujahedin-e Khalq Muslim Brotherhood Nabucco NAFTA Naftogaz NASA Nation of Islam National Security Agency NATO NDAA NDI NED Non-aligned Movement NORAD Nord Stream NORTHCOM Northern Distribution Network NSA OECD Oerlikon OIC OPCW OPEC Open Government Partnership Organization of American States OSCE OTW movement OUN / UPA PACE PACOM Pan-Europa movement Pegida Pentagon PJAK PKK Podemos PRISM PYD Red Cross Renova Republican Party Rosatom Roscosmos Rosneft Rosoboronexport Ruhrgas RusAl RWE SABSA Scientology Shanghai Cooperation Organization Shell Siemens South Stream Southern Command Standard & Poor's Statoil Strategic Nuclear Forces Stratfor SWF SWIFT Syrian National Council SYRIZA Taliban Tamarod TAPI TeleSur TNK-BP Total Trans-Pacific Partnership Transneft TTIP TTP Turkish Stream Twitter UN UN International Court UNASUR UNESCO UNICEF USAID Valdai Club Visegrad Group Wall Street Westinghouse WHO Wikileaks World Bank WTO Yukos “Mass Atrocity Response Operations”

Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal



© Strategic Culture Foundation


Main Politics History&Culture Archive Authors Popular
  Economics Columns About Contact


David Kerans is a historian of Russia and financial analyst. He has held appointments at Harvard, Stanford, and Yale Universities, as well as Wall St. investment houses. Lives in New York.

all articles