Mobile version Today: 21.11.2014 Last update 20:27 | Select date RUS | ENG | SRB
 
 
home sitemap write a letter facebook twitter
Add to favourites RSS


ONLINE JOURNAL
About us
Authors
Contacts
    Obama Launches His War, Finally  
    All Factors Point to CIA Aerially Assassinating Brazilian Presidential Candidate  
    MH-17: Beware of the «Chameleon»  
  HOME PAGE WORLD BUSINESS HISTORY & CULTURE COLUMNISTS  
 
 
 
EDITOR'S CHOICE
 
PCR interviewed by Russia and Italy
 
Delusional US ‘Group Think’ on Syria, Ukraine
all articles
 
 
 
 
NEWS
 
 
US Used Al-Qaeda in Yemen to Blackmail Sanaa: President’s Adviser...

EuroMaidan anniversary: 21 steps from peaceful rally to civil war...

Poroshenko promises to present Heroes of Ukraine titles to Heavenly Hundred...

United States against the agreement with Iran due to pressure Riyadh and Tel Aviv...

Former CIA Director Urges US Public to Examine All Sides of Torture Report...

Russia warns US against supplying ‘lethal defensive aid’ to Ukraine...

Military Budget Cuts Stand in Way of Obama’s Defense Strategy: Pentagon...

Russia ‘Noble War Prize’ comments about Obama on track: Analyst...

Is Obama Trying to Cause Civil Unrest in America?...

Isis Extends Deadly Reach with Suicide Bombing in Kurdish Capital...

Ukraine loses about 2,000 armored vehicles in southeastern war zone...

IS, nuclear talks top energy summit in Turkey...

North Korea ready to discuss transit of Russian gas to South Korea - Lavrov...

Putin names three key points of resistance to extremism...

Israel to cooperate with UN Gaza inquiry...

all news
 
 
 
FACEBOOK
 
 

 

 
 
 
back print
 
COLUMNISTS

Liberty, where has it gone?

Rafe MAIR | 26.02.2012 | 00:00
 

Governments hate civil rights and have for eons. People get uppity when they exercise their right to liberty especially the right to speak one’s mind.

“Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!" is a quotation attributed to Patrick Henry from a speech he made to the Virginia Convention on March 23, 1775 and is credited with having swung the balance in convincing the Virginia House of Burgesses to pass a resolution delivering Virginia troops to the Revolutionary War. Among the delegates to the convention were future US Presidents Thomas Jefferson and George Washington. And indeed, Henry’s cri de couer and Thomas Paine’s pamphlets gave the necessary moral underpinning to the revolutionary cause.

How interesting it is to note that the second president, John Adams and the Congress, in 1798, caused the Sedition Act to be passed which made it a crime to publish "false, scandalous, and malicious writing" against the government or certain officials” (meaning Congressmen, Senators and Presidents). It was passed on July 14, 1798, with an expiration date of March 3, 1801 (the day before Adams' presidential term was to end). I point this out to show that Bills of Rights or their equivalent often sound a hell of a lot better than they are. One of the most emphatic codes of citizen rights was that of the Soviet Union.

In America, which invades other countries to give them bills of rights, now interprets “peaceful assembly” to mean a special area, enforced by the police, a long way from where the objects of the assembly are slow as not to embarrass visiting dignitaries. Guantanomo Bay holds scores of inmates that have languished in durance vile for more than a decade uncharged with any offence – this in spite of President Obama’ solemn vow to close the prison down.

The right to torture people suspected of certain activities was approved by Bush II and Obama has done little to stop it. British Columbia, my province, passed a law whereby a policeman, thinking that a driver may have been drinking, can confiscate the car, impose a large fine and require that the driver install in his car a gadget that wouldn’t allow the engine to start if the driver has alcohol on his breath. I’m told that this exercise can cost up to $6,000. The law wasn’t challenged because there was no access to the courts! This has since been held to be unconstitutional.

It’s in the field of electronics where government abuse has become egregiously evil. But, before I go on let me say to those who support draconian laws in this area because “if you’re innocent, why object” I have this short answer – “at stake is my privacy”. I regard my privacy just as critical as free speech and freedom of the press are to my liberty.

Great Britain can now access 80% of citizens emails. London is festooned with security cameras. The UK parliament passed a law preventing discussion of a case and even prohibiting the publication of the fact that the law was passed! The courts made gave short shrift to that one but here is the country to which virtually all former colonies look up to as preserving basic human rights. 

The Parliament of Canada, with its neo-con Conservative government, will soon have a law enabling the police to access all computers with internet (basically all) to determine if any citizen is watching “kiddie porn”. It doesn’t seem to have occurred to these right wing airheads that police will use that ability to do much more than just look at child pornography. Now France has a law forbidding women, effectively Muslim women, to wear the burka or full veil. What the hell is this world coming to?

Effectively, Muslim women could walk down the street, go into stores and so on with nothing covering their breast but go to jail for wearing a veil! Presumably, a Muslim woman could, like any man, wear a ski mask. Or would that depend upon how cold it is? Perhaps traffic wardens will, armed with a thermometer, check out all ski masks first to sort out males from females and arrest the latter.

This raises another interesting question – may a man wear a burka just for the hell of it? If not, why? Doesn’t liberty mean most strongly that men and women are equal before the law?

I hear support for France’s ill-liberality which somehow is based upon everyone else’s right to see the face of women wearing a burka! Really? Where is that written? I’ve spent decades studying people’s rights as a lawyer, then as a cabinet minister in charge of constitutional matters then 25 years as a broadcaster doing politics and I’ve never seen or heard of any such right. What this burka issue, no matter how it’s started up, is all about is plain, raw bigotry. How have we reached the red-necked societies we’ve become?

I believe it’s come out of the almost constant state of war so many countries have been in going back to World War II – for example, Britain suspended habeas corpus and threw hundreds of aliens in jail for the duration even though few of them had shown any propensity towards fascism as preached by the Nazis.

Canada and the US threw all people of Japanese ancestry – most were Canadian or American citizens - in concentration camps and, in Canada, sold all their belongings at 10 cents on the dollar, the proceeds of which went towards their upkeep!

History teaches us that once you start down this pathway it quickly becomes a slippery slope to dictatorship. Аs Benjamin Franklin put it, “who would trade liberty for security will lose both”. This is becoming truer and truer as time goes by.

The ultimate hypocrisy of this is that Canada and the United States – indeed the countries in the NATO - are in Afghanistan and Iraq to help them become democracies which neither have ever been. Israel, which discriminates against Israeli Arabs big time, are about to bring democracy to Iran by bombing Hell out of them. 

Perhaps on reflection, the most hypocritical of all is France which has the anti burka law. It once held Algeria as part of Metropolitan France thus making all Algerians French citizens. Now, with Algeria independent, France no longer sees its Muslims as friends but a dangerous minority.

When the liberties of people are denied them it indicates the erosion of the principles of democracy in that land. Democracy is too vulnerable at the best of times and cannot afford to persecute its citizens by spying on them, dishonouring bais tenets of freedom or interfering with harmless customs no matter how noble such policies are presented.

 
Tags:
 

 
Rating: 5.0 (8)      Your rating: 1 2 3 4 5     
 
Send by e-mail

Социальные комментарии Cackle
Comments
 
To add a comment, Login or Register
 
 
 
OUR COLUMNIST
    Wayne MADSEN

CIA Assassination Furthered Dutch Neo-Colonialism

It has been the policy of the Barack Obama administration to oppose the granting of independence by European colonial powers to any more territories in the Caribbean. Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte told the leaders and people of six Dutch territories in the Caribbean in July 2013 that the Netherlands was prepared to grant independence to the islands but that the United States was adamantly against the idea... But how far has the Obama administration and the freewheeling Central Intelligence Agency gone in order to prevent any newly-independent nations in the Caribbean? Some suggest that under its thuggish director, John O. Brennan, the CIA engaged in political assassination to help drive home its point...

21.11.2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
TAGS
 
 
 
Aeroflot AFISMA African Union Africom AIPAC Al Qaeda Al Shabaab Al-Jazeera ALBA Amnesty International Anonymous APEC Arab League ASEAN ATAKA Atomstroyexport Bank for International Settlements Bank of America Barclays Basel Committee BBC Bilderberg Club Black Bloc Blackwater Boco Haram BP BRICS CELAC Center for Responsive Politics CEPAL Chevron CIA CICA CIS Citigroup CNN Committee of 147 Committee of 300 Council of Europe Council on Foreign Relations Crescent Crescent Petroleum CSTO Customs Union DARPA Davos DEA Defense Intelligence Agency DIA Dragon Family E.ON Eager Lion ECOWAS EDA ELNET Enbridge Pipelines ETA EU EULEX EurAsEc Eurasian Union European Commission European Court of Human Rights European Union Exxon Mobil Facebook FAO FARC FATAH FBI FDA Federal Reserve FIFA Financial Action Task Force Financial Stability Board Fitch Franklin Templeton Freedom House FRS FSB FTA FUEN G-4 G20 G7 G8 GATA Gazprom GECF Glonass Goldman Sachs Google Greenpeace GUAM Guardian Gulf Cooperation Council Hague Tribunal HAMAS Heritage Foundation Hezbollah Hizb ut-Tahrir HSBC Human Rights Watch IAEA IEA IHRC IMF International Criminal Court Interpol IOC ISAF Islamic jihad Islamic Revolution Guards Corps ITERA Jamestown JP Morgan Jundullah KFOR KLA Ku Klux Klan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam Lukoil Massachusetts Institute of Technology Mercosur Microsoft Missile defense Missile Defense Agency Moody's Morgan Stanley Mossad Most-Favoured Nation Mujahedin-e Khalq Muslim Brotherhood Nabucco Naftogaz NASA Nation of Islam National Security Agency NATO NDAA NDI NED Non-aligned Movement NORAD Nord Stream NORTHCOM Northern Distribution Network NSA OECD Oerlikon OIC OPCW OPEC Open Government Partnership Organization of American States OSCE OTW movement OUN / UPA PACE PACOM Pan-Europa movement Pentagon PJAK PKK PRISM PYD Red Cross Renova Republican Party Rosatom Roscosmos Rosneft Rosoboronexport Ruhrgas RusAl RWE SABSA Scientology Shanghai Cooperation Organization Shell Siemens South Stream Southern Command Standard & Poor's Statoil Strategic Nuclear Forces Stratfor SWF SWIFT Syrian National Council SYRIZA Taliban Tamarod TAPI TeleSur TNK-BP Total Transneft TTIP Twitter UN UN International Court UNASUR UNESCO USAID Valdai Club Visegrad Group Wall Street Westinghouse Wikileaks World Bank WTO Yukos “Mass Atrocity Response Operations”
 
 
 

Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.


 

 

 
 
© Strategic Culture Foundation

RSS

Main Politics History&Culture Archive Authors Popular
  Economics Columns About Contact

Яндекс.Метрика

 

Rafe MAIR

Former lawyer, cabinet minister and scratch golfer who went into honest work and became a broadcaster and writer on public affairs.


all articles